Health

With housing, Hong Kong’s not letting the best be the enemy of the good


A favourite expression of Hong Kong’s former chief secretary David Akers-Jones was: “Don’t let the best be the enemy of the good”. What he was trying to tell us junior administrators was that we should not let the search for perfection, which might take a long time, deter us from implementing something which could be done quickly if it would benefit people.

French philosopher Montesquieu is first credited with articulating the sentiment in his 1726 writings: “The best is the mortal enemy of the good”. Some put the origin even further back to Aristotle in ancient Greece.

It was undoubtedly in this spirit that Chief Executive John Lee Ka-chiu, in his policy address last October, announced plans to improve the situation of subdivided housing. An estimated 220,000 people live in 110,000 such premises, many of which offered undesirable living conditions. He has established a task force to produce, by August, recommendations on minimum standards in terms of living space, building and fire safety, hygiene requirements and other aspects of dealing with the problem.
The task force, led by Deputy Financial Secretary Michael Wong Wai-lun, held its first meeting last November. It has since invited views from interested parties, and in May the Hong Kong Institute of Surveyors held a press conference to outline its suggestions. It recommended a minimum unit size of 100 sq ft, including the kitchen and bathroom, which should be separate.

There were also proposals on the minimum door and corridor width and ceiling height, and annual inspections for fire safety. The institute estimated that around 30 per cent of Hong Kong’s subdivided units – some 30,000 – were smaller than its recommendations.

For those not previously familiar with the situation, these are sobering numbers. There cannot be many subscribers of this newspaper with a kitchen and bathroom of less than 100 sq ft in total. The idea that such an area should include both of these facilities and living space is almost beyond comprehension.

For one person, let alone two or more (the average subdivided household is of two, after all), we have a picture of serious social deprivation. Small wonder Lee gave such a high priority to securing improvement. The situation did not start on his watch and obviously developed over many years, but at last we have a commitment to do something about it.

The task force will have its work cut out coming up with practical short-term measures. The surveyors’ recommendations are a good starting point from a professional perspective, but it is easy to foresee problems. For example, some premises will simply not lend themselves to physical adaptation to comply with the space, height and width requirements.

Making the corridor wider may involve reducing the living space. The plumbing may not support separate kitchen and bathroom facilities for each unit. What if the fire inspection finds the layout to be dangerous? Ruling any unit non-compliant for whatever reason is bound to render someone homeless.

Should compromises be made between the different causes of non-compliance, for example by giving priority to fire safety over minor shortfalls in space? That seems easy enough. But what if remedying the fire safety aspect has implications for hygiene? How could reoccupation be prevented if the original residents are rehoused? Is there a role for the Penny’s Bay quarantine facility and the other Covid-19 related standby facilities?

The question is choosing what to do and what priority to give to the different options. In the long term, only a substantial increase in the housing stock is going to make a serious dent in the size of the problem.

24:45

The grim reality of life in Hong Kong’s ‘coffin homes’ | Talking Post with Yonden Lhatoo

The grim reality of life in Hong Kong’s ‘coffin homes’ | Talking Post with Yonden Lhatoo

Fortunately, on this front, the forecasts are more encouraging. About two months ago, think tank Our Hong Kong Foundation said it expected 35,000 public housing units to be completed on average over the next five years, with the wait dropping from 5.8 years now to 4.6 years in 2026-27.
The organisation also recommended the opportunity be taken to gradually increase the size of the housing. During a radio show to discuss the report, it was suggested that we should be thinking in terms of 250 sq ft per person, up from the existing 170 sq ft average.
On the basis of a two-and-a-half-person household, Hong Kong should build a lot more homes in the range of 600-700 sq ft. By happy chance, this is about the size of the land footprint of small houses in the New Territories.
The government is also planning the construction of a large number of decent-sized housing units over the following five years, so within 10 years, all should be well. But long-term plans sometimes go wrong or slip – remember the “85,000 per year” aspiration in the early days of the special administrative region?
That is why the government introduced the idea of “light public housing” – to provide some hope and relief for those who have been waiting a long time for housing. This interim measure, which can be implemented more quickly than permanent public housing, involves construction of about 30,000 such units by 2027-28. The first batch of 2,150 flats will be ready by early next year and applications opened last week.

Looking at the overall situation, we are planning for the best. But that has not stopped us from planning for a good interim solution. Lee is taking that a step further and trying to find a good interim solution to the interim solution. David would be very pleased.

Mike Rowse is an independent commentator



READ SOURCE

Business Asia
the authorBusiness Asia

Leave a Reply